2015
DOI: 10.1177/1535370215603514
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond emotions: A meta-analysis of neural response within face processing system in social anxiety

Abstract: Patients with social anxiety disorder (SAD) experience anxiety and avoidance in face-to-face interactions. We performed a metaanalysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies in SAD to provide a comprehensive understanding of the neural underpinnings of face perception in this disorder. To this purpose, we adopted an innovative approach, asking authors for unpublished data. This is a common procedure for behavioral meta-analyses, which, however has never been used in neuroimaging studies. We se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
48
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
10
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with previous meta‐analyses on depression and social anxiety disorders showing increased reactivity in these regions during emotional face processing (Binelli et al, ; Delvecchio et al, ; Gee et al, ; Kanske and Kotz, ; MacQueen, ; Wu et al, ). As core regions of the dorsal striatum and the basal ganglia, both GP and PUT, are not only involved in motor functions, but also play important roles in other domains, such as emotional regulation (Frank et al, ; Sztainberg, Kuperman, Justice, & Chen, ), salience processing (Gentili et al, ; Menon, ; Smith, Berridge, & Aldridge, ) and social‐cognitive functions (MacQueen, ). Previous clinical studies demonstrated that both depression and social anxiety patients demonstrate marked impairments in emotion regulation (Jazaieri, Morrison, Goldin, & Gross, ; Joormann, ; Joormann and Stanton, ), aberrant salience processing (Hamilton et al, ; Pannekoek et al, ; Yuen et al, ), and deficient social cognition (Lavoie, Battaglia, & Achim, ; Weightman, Air, & Baune, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is consistent with previous meta‐analyses on depression and social anxiety disorders showing increased reactivity in these regions during emotional face processing (Binelli et al, ; Delvecchio et al, ; Gee et al, ; Kanske and Kotz, ; MacQueen, ; Wu et al, ). As core regions of the dorsal striatum and the basal ganglia, both GP and PUT, are not only involved in motor functions, but also play important roles in other domains, such as emotional regulation (Frank et al, ; Sztainberg, Kuperman, Justice, & Chen, ), salience processing (Gentili et al, ; Menon, ; Smith, Berridge, & Aldridge, ) and social‐cognitive functions (MacQueen, ). Previous clinical studies demonstrated that both depression and social anxiety patients demonstrate marked impairments in emotion regulation (Jazaieri, Morrison, Goldin, & Gross, ; Joormann, ; Joormann and Stanton, ), aberrant salience processing (Hamilton et al, ; Pannekoek et al, ; Yuen et al, ), and deficient social cognition (Lavoie, Battaglia, & Achim, ; Weightman, Air, & Baune, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Facial recognition dysfunction may contribute to avoidance behaviors and atypical social interaction in anxiety disorders (particularly social anxiety disorders) (Gentili et al 2016). Yet anxiety's relationship to facial recognition has not been comprehensively investigated (Yoon et al 2016), and no known studies have investigated the impact of threat of shock on face recognition.…”
Section: Anxiety and Face Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an alternative means of assessing attention to salient stimuli, the late positive potential (LPP) - an event-related potential (ERP) component that begins around 300–500 ms after stimulus onset and is larger for emotional compared to neutral stimuli (Cuthbert, Schupp, Bradley, Birbaumer, & Lang, 2000; Hajcak, MacNamara, & Olvet, 2010; Schupp et al, 2004) – provides a relatively cost-effective, well-tolerated and dynamic measure. Both the LPP and fMRI have been used widely in the basic and clinical affective neuroscience literatures to assess the processing of emotional scenes and faces (e.g., De Taeye et al, 2015; Etkin & Wager, 2007; Foti, Olvet, Klein, & Hajcak, 2010; Fusar-Poli et al, 2009; Gentili et al, 2016; MacNamara et al, 2016; MacNamara, Post, Kennedy, Rabinak, & Phan, 2013; MacNamara, Schmidt, Zelinsky, & Hajcak, 2012). Though fMRI and LPP studies of emotion processing have often used the same stimuli and paradigms, there has – until recently (Liu, Huang, McGinnis-Deweese, Keil, & Ding, 2012; Sabatinelli, Keil, Frank, & Lang, 2013) – been little understanding of how these measures relate to each other.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%