2016
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain dynamics of post‐task resting state are influenced by expertise: Insights from baseball players

Abstract: Post-task resting state dynamics can be viewed as a task-driven state where behavioral performance is improved through endogenous, non-explicit learning. Tasks that have intrinsic value for individuals are hypothesized to produce post-task resting state dynamics that promote learning. We measure simultaneous fMRI/EEG and DTI in Division-1 collegiate baseball players and compare to a group of controls, examining differences in both functional and structural connectivity. To examine functional differences, parti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
36
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
2
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With these single-trial results in hand, we used the timing and value of maximum discrimination, as indexed by the AUC of the classifier, to correlate this to the mode of music production relative to cellist. We found trends that demonstrate a graded relationship, which previously was only seen as a binary differentiation between NM to musicians (Musacchia et al, 2008;Sherwin and Sajda, 2013) and other expert to novice groups (Muraskin et al, 2016;Muraskin et al, 2015). In particular, we find that the more similarity in musical sound production between the subject and the stimulus, the faster the neural response of the subject to the AME in that stimulus.…”
Section: Single-trial Erp Analysis Reveals Graded Musical Expertise Isupporting
confidence: 47%
“…With these single-trial results in hand, we used the timing and value of maximum discrimination, as indexed by the AUC of the classifier, to correlate this to the mode of music production relative to cellist. We found trends that demonstrate a graded relationship, which previously was only seen as a binary differentiation between NM to musicians (Musacchia et al, 2008;Sherwin and Sajda, 2013) and other expert to novice groups (Muraskin et al, 2016;Muraskin et al, 2015). In particular, we find that the more similarity in musical sound production between the subject and the stimulus, the faster the neural response of the subject to the AME in that stimulus.…”
Section: Single-trial Erp Analysis Reveals Graded Musical Expertise Isupporting
confidence: 47%
“…Taken together all these findings, one could assume that the brain networks influence cognitive functions and vice versa. Additional sport‐neuroscientific research also showed that these superiorities may be caused for example by higher degrees of white matter density as well as integrity—that is, myelination—in the nervous system (Muraskin, ; Muraskin et al, ; Muraskin, Sherwin, & Sajda, ). A higher degree of myelination speeds up the transfer of information among nerve cells (Long & Corfas, ; Mount & Monje, ; Wenger, Brozzoli, Lindenberger, & Lövdén, ), which results in unique cognitive skill profiles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While genetics may contribute to white matter architecture, overwhelming evidence suggests that experience sculpts these pathways over time. For example, variability in the white matter signal has been shown to covary with several social Molesworth et al, 2015), biological (Arfanakis et al, 2013;Miralbell et al, 2012;Verstynen et al, 2013), and cognitive (Muraskin et al, 2016;Verstynen, 2014;Ystad et al, 2011) attributes. In many cases, it is difficult to extract or identify specific pathways or systems that link white matter pathways to these shared experiential factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent advancements in neuroimaging techniques, particularly diffusion MRI (dMRI), have opened the door to mapping the macroscopic-level properties of the structural connectome in vivo (Le Bihan & Johansen-Berg, 2012). As a result, a growing body of research has focused on quantifying how variability in structural connectivity associates with individual differences in functional properties of brain networks (Muldoon et al, 2016;Passingham, Stephan, & Kötter, 2002), as well as associating with differences in social Molesworth, Sheu, Cohen, Gianaros, & Verstynen, 2015), biological (Arfanakis et al, 2013;Miralbell et al, 2012;Verstynen et al, 2013), and cognitive (Muraskin et al, 2016;Verstynen, 2014;Ystad et al, 2011) attributes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%