2018
DOI: 10.1037/per0000235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Callousness and affective face processing in adults: Behavioral and brain-potential indicators.

Abstract: The investigation of callous-unemotional (CU) traits has been central to contemporary research on child behavior problems, and served as the impetus for inclusion of a specifier for conduct disorder in the latest edition of the official psychiatric diagnostic system. Here, we report results from 2 studies that evaluated the construct validity of callousness as assessed in adults, by testing for affiliated deficits in behavioral and neural processing of fearful faces, as have been shown in youthful samples. We … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

5
61
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
5
61
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in preschool‐aged children, P2 amplitudes are greater when viewing “antisocial” actions than “prosocial” actions (Meidenbauer et al, ). In adult populations, reduced P2 to negative stimuli (e.g., fearful or distressed faces) are associated with CU traits (Brislin et al, ) or “emotional desensitization” (Stockdale et al, ). Taken together, findings from this study imply that, after engaging with the empathy game, children's attentional resources are more easily mobilized when encountering antisocial or harming actions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in preschool‐aged children, P2 amplitudes are greater when viewing “antisocial” actions than “prosocial” actions (Meidenbauer et al, ). In adult populations, reduced P2 to negative stimuli (e.g., fearful or distressed faces) are associated with CU traits (Brislin et al, ) or “emotional desensitization” (Stockdale et al, ). Taken together, findings from this study imply that, after engaging with the empathy game, children's attentional resources are more easily mobilized when encountering antisocial or harming actions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In typically developing preschool aged children, P200 amplitudes are greater for “antisocial” than for “prosocial” actions (Meidenbauer, Cowell, & Decety, ). In adult population, conditions such as phobic (Sarlo & Munafò, ), high‐level of callous‐unemotional (CU) traits (Brislin et al, ) and “emotional desensitization” resulting from exposure to violence (Stockdale, Morrison, Kmiecik, Garbarino, & Silton, ) are known to lead to reduced P200 in response to distress cues (e.g., expression of fear), indicating that sustained attention and processing is precluded. LPPs are known to index top‐down cognitive reappraisal and regulation of emotion arousal (Dennis & Hajcak, ; Hajcak & Dennis, ; Hajcak, Weinberg, MacNamara, & Foti, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emo, emotional, Pos, positive, Neg, negative, and Neu, neutral. The supplementary references(Rothemund et al, 2012;Brislin et al, 2018 andBrennan et al, 2018), were not added due to characteristics of clinical measurement (externalizing scale) and absence of visual emotional stimuli.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future research in this area would benefit from using a welldesigned experimental paradigm with sufficient power to detect an effect. As indicated by previous research (Brislin et al, 2017;Cigna et al, 2017;Gillespie et al, 2015;Hastings et al, 2008), researchers may create sufficient task difficulty by using ambiguous or dynamic facial stimuli rather than prototypical expressions. Researchers should also consider whether the relationship between psychopathy, affect recognition, and facial expression intensity differs by emotion.…”
Section: Im P LI Ca Ti Ons F or F Utur E Res Ea Rchmentioning
confidence: 99%