It has been shown in nonhuman primates that the posterior parietal cortex is involved in coordination of arm and eye movements in space, whereas the anterior intraparietal area in the anterior lateral bank of the intraparietal sulcus plays a crucial role in fine finger movements, such as grasping. In this study we show by optoelectronic movement recordings that patients with cortical lesions involving the anterior lateral bank of the intraparietal sulcus have selective deficits in the coordination of finger movements required for object grasping, whereas reaching is much less disturbed. Patients with parietal lesions sparing the cortex lining the anterior intraparietal sulcus showed intact grasping behavior. Complementary evidence was obtained from functional MRI in normal control subjects showing a specific activation of the anterior lateral bank of the intraparietal sulcus during grasping. In conclusion, this combined lesion and activation study suggests that the anterior lateral bank of the intraparietal sulcus, possibly including the human homologue of the anterior intraparietal area, mediates the processing of sensorimotor integration of precisely tuned finger movements in humans.
Background. Rehabilitation of the severely affected paretic arm after stroke represents a major challenge, especially in the presence of sensory impairment. Objective. To evaluate the effect of a therapy that includes use of a mirror to simulate the affected upper extremity with the unaffected upper extremity early after stroke. Methods. Thirty-six patients with severe hemiparesis because of a first-ever ischemic stroke in the territory of the middle cerebral artery were enrolled, no more than 8 weeks after the stroke. They completed a protocol of 6 weeks of additional therapy (30 minutes a day, 5 days a week), with random assignment to either mirror therapy (MT) or an equivalent control therapy (CT). The main outcome measures were the Fugl-Meyer subscores for the upper extremity, evaluated by independent raters through videotape. Patients also underwent functional and neuropsychological testing. Results. In the subgroup of 25 patients with distal plegia at the beginning of the therapy, MT patients regained more distal function than CT patients. Furthermore, across all patients, MT improved recovery of surface sensibility. Neither of these effects depended on the side of the lesioned hemisphere. MT stimulated recovery from hemineglect. Conclusions. MT early after stroke is a promising method to improve sensory and attentional deficits and to support motor recovery in a distal plegic limb.
Analysis 5.1. Comparison 5 Sensitivity analysis by trial methodology, Outcome 1 Motor function at the end of intervention....... Analysis 5.2. Comparison 5 Sensitivity analysis by trial methodology, Outcome 2 Motor impairment at the end of intervention.... Analysis 6.1. Comparison 6 Post hoc sensitivity analysis removing studies that only included participants with CRPS a er stroke.
Two patients with midline tumours and disturbances of bimanual co-ordination as the presenting symptoms were examined. Both reported difficulties whenever the two hands had to act together simultaneously, whereas they had no problems with unimanual dexterity or the use of both hands sequentially. In the first patient the lesion was confined to the cingulate gyrus; in the second it also invaded the corpus callosum and the supplementary motor area. Kinematic analysis of bimanual in-phase and anti-phase movements revealed an impairment of both the temporal adjustment between the hands and the independence of movements between the two hands. A functional imaging study in six volunteers, who performed the same bimanual in-phase and anti-phase tasks, showed strong activations of midline areas including the cingulate and ventral supplementary motor area. The prominent activation of the ventral medial wall motor areas in the volunteers in conjunction with the bimanual co-ordination disorder in the two patients with lesions compromising their function is evidence for their pivotal role in bimanual co-ordination.
Background Mirror therapy is used to improve motor function after stroke. During mirror therapy, a mirror is placed in the patient's midsagittal plane, thus reflecting movements of the non-paretic side as if it were the affected side. Objectives To summarise the effectiveness of mirror therapy for improving motor function, activities of daily living, pain and visuospatial neglect in patients after stroke.
Abstract. Mirror therapy is a therapy to treat patients with pain syndromes or hemiparesis after stroke. However, the underlying neurophysiologic mechanisms are not clearly understood. In order to determine the effect of a mirrorlike illusion (MIR) on brain activity using functional near-infrared spectroscopy, 20 healthy right-handed subjects were examined. A MIR was induced by a digital horizontal inversion of the subjects' filmed hand. Optodes were placed on the primary motor cortex (M1) and the occipito-parietal cortex (precuneus, PC). Regions of interest (ROI) were defined a priori based on previous results of similar studies and confirmed by the analysis of effect sizes. Analysis of variance of the ROI signal revealed a dissociated pattern: at the PC, the MIR caused a significant inversion of a hemispheric lateralization opposite to the perceived hand, independent of the moving hand. In contrast, activity in M1 showed lateralization opposite to the moving hand, but revealed no mirror effect. These findings extend our understanding on interhemispheric rivalry and indicate that a MIR is integrated into visuomotor coordination similar to normal view, irrespective of the hand that is actually performing the task.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.