2016
DOI: 10.1002/da.22556
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defining biotypes for depression and anxiety based on large-scale circuit dysfunction: a theoretical review of the evidence and future directions for clinical translation

Abstract: Complex emotional, cognitive and self-reflective functions rely on the activation and connectivity of large-scale neural circuits. These circuits offer a relevant scale of focus for conceptualizing a taxonomy for depression and anxiety based on specific profiles (or biotypes) of neural circuit dysfunction. Here, the theoretical review first outlined the current consensus as to what constitutes the organization of large-scale circuits in the human brain identified using parcellation and meta-analysis. The focus… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

5
187
1
5

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 230 publications
(198 citation statements)
references
References 178 publications
5
187
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Psychiatry and Neurology have turned to FC to develop new diagnostic tests, predict treatment response and relate brain function to symptoms [11,12]. This is in answer to an urgent need for quantitative correlates of brain illnesses and network-based approaches show great promise to this end [13]. However, when testing candidate measures for clinical applications, it is important to consider that measures of robust group-level effects, which make up a large portion of the existent literature, might not necessarily be suited to make inferences about individuals [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Psychiatry and Neurology have turned to FC to develop new diagnostic tests, predict treatment response and relate brain function to symptoms [11,12]. This is in answer to an urgent need for quantitative correlates of brain illnesses and network-based approaches show great promise to this end [13]. However, when testing candidate measures for clinical applications, it is important to consider that measures of robust group-level effects, which make up a large portion of the existent literature, might not necessarily be suited to make inferences about individuals [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall our findings are in alignment with the triple network model of psychopathology (Menon, 2011) which states that aberrant organization and functioning of the ECN, SAL, and DMN are prominent features of several major psychiatric and neurological disorders. In addition, the ECN, SAL, and DMN networks are part of the six types of circuit dysfunction that contribute to the variability in depression and anxiety (Williams, 2017). Further investigation of connectivity among these networks can provide better understanding of brain disruptions in psychopathy and other psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia, depression, autism, and anxiety disorders.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Major depressive disorder (MDD) has been conceptualized as a brain disorder that affects information exchange across large‐scale neural systems . An important focus for examining such large‐scale neural system disturbances is the thalamus as most information input to the cortex is routed through this subcortical region .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Major depressive disorder (MDD) has been conceptualized as a brain disorder that affects information exchange across large-scale neural systems. [1][2][3] An important focus for examining such largescale neural system disturbances is the thalamus as most information input to the cortex is routed through this subcortical region. [4][5][6] There is considerable evidence from neuroimaging and histological studies implicating dysfunction of the thalamus and its projection cortical targets in the pathophysiology of MDD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%