This review aims to discuss the evidence supporting the link between chronic stress, cognitive function and mental health. Over the years, the associations between these concepts have been investigated in different populations. This review summarizes the findings that have emerged from older populations as well as from populations suffering from pathological aging, namely Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease. Although older adults are an interesting population to study in terms of chronic stress, other stress-related diseases can occur throughout the lifespan. The second section covers some of these stress-related diseases that have recently received a great deal of attention, namely burnout, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder. Given that chronic stress contributes to the development of certain pathologies by accelerating and/or exacerbating pre-existing vulnerabilities that vary from one individual to the other, the final section summarizes data obtained on potential variables contributing to the association between chronic stress and cognition.
Previous studies have shown that people who develop psychopathology such as posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) following stress exposure are characterized by reduced hippocampal (HC) volume and impaired HC functional connectivity with the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC). Nevertheless, the exact interrelationship between reduced HC volume and HC-vmPFC connectivity deficits in the context of stress has yet to be established. Furthermore, it is still not clear whether such neural abnormalities are stress induced or precursors for vulnerability. In this study, we combined measurements of MRI, functional MRI (fMRI), and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) to prospectively study 33 a priori healthy Israeli soldiers both pre- and post-exposure to stress during their military service. Thus, we were able to assess the contributions of structural and functional features of the HC and its connectivity to the onset and progression of maladaptive response to stress (i.e., increased PTSD symptoms post-exposure). We found that soldiers with decreased HC volume following military service (i.e., post-exposure) displayed more PTSD-related symptoms post-exposure as well as reduced HC-vmPFC functional and structural connectivity post-exposure, compared to soldiers with increased HC volume following military service. In contrast, initial smaller HC volume pre-exposure did not have an effect on any of these factors. Our results therefore suggest that reduction in HC volume and connectivity with the vmPFC together mark a maladaptive response to stressful military service. As stress-induced HC volume reductions were previously shown to be reversible, these localized biological markers may carry valuable therapeutic potential.
All atypical antipsychotics avoid extrapyramidal side-effects yet differ in their propensity to cause other side-effects, like prolactin elevation. We proposed that the atypical antipsychotics with a propensity for prolactin elevation would show a higher pituitary versus striatal D2 receptor occupancy. To investigate this hypothesis, we tested four atypical antipsychotics, two that are commonly associated with prolactin elevation (amisulpride and risperidone) and two that are less frequently associated (quetiapine and olanzapine). In particular, we calculated their ED 50 values to increase plasma prolactin and block peripheral pituitary D2 receptors to their ED 50 values to antagonize apomorphine-induced stereotypy and occupy central striatal D2 receptors. All antipsychotics dose dependently increased prolactin levels and antagonized apomorphine-induced stereotypy. However, the central to peripheral potency (ED 50 for apomorphine antagonism to ED 50 for prolactin elevation) differed remarkably across these drugs: amisulpride (21764), risperidone (14), quetiapine (10), and olanzapine (1.7). Compounds displaying a higher peripheral potency brought about higher prolactin levels for a given level of functional central antagonism. This dissociation between central and peripheral effects was explained by the differential occupancy of D2 receptors in the striatum versus in the pituitary [ratio of striatal/pituitary ED 50 values (milligram per kilogram) for D2 occupancy): amisulpride (17/0.026 ϭ 654), risperidone (0.89/0.081 ϭ 14), quetiapine (24/4.1 ϭ 6), olanzapine (0.30/0.43 ϭ 0.7). These results indicate that dissociation between central and peripheral D2 receptor occupancy is a major determinant of the degree of prolactin elevation observed at therapeutic doses.
Perceived social-evaluative threat triggers the hypothalamic-pituitary adrenal (HPA) axis, resulting in cortisol release. The current study examined the effects of varying the levels of social-evaluative threat on the stress response. Sixty healthy men (mean age + 23.17 +/- 3.89 years) underwent a public speaking task. Four conditions were established on the basis of panel location (inside or outside the room) and number of panelists (one or two). It was hypothesized that these variations affect salivary cortisol and physiological responses in a gradient manner. The task elicited significant cortisol and blood pressure changes for all conditions, but no difference between the groups was found, suggesting that all conditions were equally stressful. Study conclusions were that, for men, the visual presence of a panel is not necessary to elicit a cortisol response. Furthermore, increasing the number of judges does not increase the intensity of the stress response in a gradual manner, but rather seems to follow a threshold pattern. Future studies should include women and try to define the possible threshold to activate the HPA axis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.