Mood Symptom Dimensions and Developmental Differences in Neurocognition in Adolescence

Kaiser, Roselinde H.; Moser, Amelia D.; Neilson, Chiara; Peterson, Elena C.; Jones, J. Graham; Hough, Christina M.; Rosenberg, Benjamin M.; Sandman, Christina F.; Schneck, Christopher D.; Miklowitz, David J.; Friedman, Naomi P.

doi:10.1177/21677026221111389

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 94 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For example, exposure to high-intensity stress in childhood and adolescence may disrupt development of large-scale neurocognitive networks involved in reward sensitivity, stress regulation or cognitive control, culminating in neurocognitive risk (McEwen & Akil, 2020). Neurocognitive risk may also vary by puberty (Kaiser et al, 2023), pubertal hormones, or age-indexed social factors. Although this study controlled for age, suggesting that neurocognitive predictors are robust across adolescence, only by examining developmental processes and moderators in longitudinal design can we begin to answer these questions.…”

Section: Limitationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Prior research has demonstrated neurocognitive abnormalities in mood disorders, including in dimensions of executive functioning, defined as higher-order cognitive abilities and related neural systems that support goal-directed behavior and adaptation (Friedman et al, 2018); and dimensions of reward sensitivity, defined as an individual’s behavioral, physiological, or emotional responsiveness to rewards (Berridge, 2018). Executive functioning ability and reward sensitivity are neurocognitive domains that show marked developmental change during adolescence and young adulthood, suggesting the importance of understanding how adolescent abnormalities in these domains may forecast risk both in the near future and across the lifespan (Kaiser et al, 2023).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation