1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4328(97)00088-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurotoxic lesions of the dorsal hippocampus and Pavlovian fear conditioning in rats

Abstract: Electrolytic lesions of the dorsal hippocampus (DH) produce deficits in both the acquisition and expression of conditional fear to contextual stimuli in rats. To assess whether damage to DH neurons is responsible for these deficits, we performed three experiments to examine the effects of neurotoxic N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) lesions of the DH on the acquisition and expression of fear conditioning. Fear conditioning consisted of the delivery of signaled or unsignaled footshocks in a novel conditioning chamber… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

60
654
17
6

Year Published

1998
1998
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 685 publications
(737 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(78 reference statements)
60
654
17
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, it is possible that chronic opiate exposure interacts with the induction of LTP at some hippocampal synapses, but leaves LTP at other synapses intact. Third, hippocampal lesions do not invariably produce deficits in learning and memory for contextual fear (Maren et al, 1997;Phillips and LeDoux, 1994), and contextual fear conditioning can be acquired in the absence of an intact hippocampus (Wiltgen et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, it is possible that chronic opiate exposure interacts with the induction of LTP at some hippocampal synapses, but leaves LTP at other synapses intact. Third, hippocampal lesions do not invariably produce deficits in learning and memory for contextual fear (Maren et al, 1997;Phillips and LeDoux, 1994), and contextual fear conditioning can be acquired in the absence of an intact hippocampus (Wiltgen et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DH is not necessary for explicit CS-US or 'foreground' contextual conditioning since post-training DH lesions or inactivation fail to impair conditioned fear both to explicit (Kim and Fanselow, 1992;Maren et al, 1997) and contextual CSs paired directly with shock (Phillips and LeDoux, 1994), and fail to impair contextual discrimination performance (Good and Honey, 1991). In contrast, the integrity of the DH is necessary for 'background' contextual fear conditioning, since post-training DH lesions abolish conditioned fear to a context that previously served as a background to CS-shock pairings and impair context-dependent latent inhibition to an explicit CS (Kim and Fanselow, 1992;Phillips and LeDoux, 1994;Maren et al, 1997;Holt and Maren, 1999). The DH interacts with subcortical brain regions via its output structure, the dorsal subiculum (Jay et al, 1992;Ferbinteanu and McDonald, 2001).…”
Section: Contributions Of the Dh Bla And Dmpfc To Cocaine-seeking Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rats were trained in a signaled fear conditioning paradigm used previously [3,20]. During the training session, rats received three trials each consisting of a 10-s presentation of the tone followed immediately by footshock (1 mA, 1 s).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cued fear memory was tested 24 h after the context test by reexposing the rats to the tone (twenty 10-s trials) in a new context (no shock was delivered). This paradigm is particularly useful since the neural circuitry underlying cue-specific and contextual conditioned fear is already well established [20]. In addition, since training takes place in a single session and is followed by distinct test sessions, it is possible to gain insight into the specific phases and nature of mnemonic function that may be affected.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%