2018
DOI: 10.15761/adcn.1000119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preserved recognition and selection of facial expression of happiness in mild Alzheimer’s Disease

Abstract: A decline in the ability to process facial expression of emotions has been reported in individuals with Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, the low number of participants and the lack of diversity in the tasks being used in previous studies leaves a gap in our knowledge about this issue. We recruited 169 participants including healthy older adults (HOA), participants with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and AD patients at different stages of the disease (mild to moderate). Four tasks including recognition, sele… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The discrepancy in relation to previous findings might stem from differences in sample characteristics or from differences in methods. Expressions of happiness and disgust are often easier to recognize than those of fear and sadness and sometimes even associated with ceiling effects (e.g., McCade et al, 2011;Moradi, Najlerahim, & Humphreys;2018;Richard-Mornas et al, 2012;Spoletini et al, 2008;Weiss et al, 2008), and this could have masked group differences in previous work. Our stimuli were selected so that they would elicit intermediate levels of performance, and this might have made our tasks more sensitive to a wider range of impairments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discrepancy in relation to previous findings might stem from differences in sample characteristics or from differences in methods. Expressions of happiness and disgust are often easier to recognize than those of fear and sadness and sometimes even associated with ceiling effects (e.g., McCade et al, 2011;Moradi, Najlerahim, & Humphreys;2018;Richard-Mornas et al, 2012;Spoletini et al, 2008;Weiss et al, 2008), and this could have masked group differences in previous work. Our stimuli were selected so that they would elicit intermediate levels of performance, and this might have made our tasks more sensitive to a wider range of impairments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%