2019
DOI: 10.1126/science.aav8130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-cell genomics identifies cell type–specific molecular changes in autism

Abstract: Despite the clinical and genetic heterogeneity of autism, bulk gene expression studies show that changes in the neocortex of autism patients converge on common genes and pathways. However, direct assessment of specific cell types in the brain affected by autism has not been feasible until recently. We used single-nucleus RNA sequencing of cortical tissue from patients with autism to identify autism-associated transcriptomic changes in specific cell types. We found that synaptic signaling of upper-layer excitat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

91
926
1
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 657 publications
(1,026 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
91
926
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…ASD downregulated modules are significantly enriched with markers of both inhibitory and excitatory neurons (Figure 2f). The strongest enrichments are inhibitory neuron subtypes expressing SST or PVALB, derived from the medial ganglionic eminence as well as deep layer excitatory neurons expressing RORB or FEZF2 (Figure 2f), suggesting that the number and/or activity of these cells is heavily decreased in ASD, consistent with a recent single cell analysis of post mortem ASD brain 25 .…”
Section: Subtype-specific Mrna Expression Differences In Asdsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…ASD downregulated modules are significantly enriched with markers of both inhibitory and excitatory neurons (Figure 2f). The strongest enrichments are inhibitory neuron subtypes expressing SST or PVALB, derived from the medial ganglionic eminence as well as deep layer excitatory neurons expressing RORB or FEZF2 (Figure 2f), suggesting that the number and/or activity of these cells is heavily decreased in ASD, consistent with a recent single cell analysis of post mortem ASD brain 25 .…”
Section: Subtype-specific Mrna Expression Differences In Asdsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Murine scRNA‐seq studies have advanced the characterization of OL‐lineage transcriptomic signatures, with several studies identifying intermediate states between progenitors and fully differentiated cells (Artegiani et al, ; Marques et al, ; reviewed in van Bruggen, Agirre, & Castelo‐Branco, ). Human tissue‐based studies that focus on OL‐lineage cells have applied sequencing of nuclei (snRNA‐seq) derived from postmortem tissues from adult “control” donors and individuals with clinical conditions that include MS (Jakel et al, ; Schirmer et al, ), Alzheimer's disease (Mathys et al, ), and autism (Velmeshev et al, ). However, studies of human OL‐lineage development remain limited by the availability of whole cell samples that would permit inclusion of non‐nuclear RNAs, and material that encompasses a wide age span including time of peak myelination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, which occurs in almost all applications. Many reference datasets have been constructed from purified cell type-specific RNA-seq data from mouse 26 , or RNA-seq data from sorted or dissociated nuclei in humans [27][28][29][30][31] , and not whole cells, which are typically profiled in homogenate sequencing studies. Gene expression levels are also quantitative within individual cells (and not binary like in DNAm data) and the necessity of absolute expression levels for absolute composition quantification has largely been overlooked.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%