The ABCD study is recruiting and following the brain development and health of over 10,000 9–10 year olds through adolescence. The imaging component of the study was developed by the ABCD Data Analysis and Informatics Center (DAIC) and the ABCD Imaging Acquisition Workgroup. Imaging methods and assessments were selected, optimized and harmonized across all 21 sites to measure brain structure and function relevant to adolescent development and addiction. This article provides an overview of the imaging procedures of the ABCD study, the basis for their selection and preliminary quality assurance and results that provide evidence for the feasibility and age-appropriateness of procedures and generalizability of findings to the existent literature.

Working memory and recognition memory develop across adolescence, but the relationship between them is not fully understood. We investigated associations between n-back task performance and subsequent recognition memory in a community sample (8–30 yr, n = 150) using tasks from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study (ABCD Study) to cross-sectionally assess memory in an age range that will be sampled longitudinally. We added a 24-h delay condition to assess long-term recognition. Overall working memory, immediate and long-term recognition performance peaked in adolescence. Age effects in recognition memory varied by items (old targets, old distractors, and new items) and delay (0 and 24 h). For immediate recognition, accuracy was higher for targets and new items than for distractors, with accuracy for targets peaking in adulthood and accuracy for new items peaking during adolescence. For long-term recognition, adolescents’ accuracy was higher for targets than distractors, while adults showed similarly high accuracy for targets and distractors and children showed low accuracy for both. This pattern appeared to be specific to recognition of items from the high working memory load condition. The results suggest that working memory may facilitate long-term recognition of task-relevant over irrelevant items and may benefit the detection of new information during adolescence.

Working memory and long-term memory develop from childhood to adulthood, but the relationship between them is not fully understood, especially during adolescence. We investigated associations between n-back task performance and subsequent recognition memory in a community sample (8-30 years, n=150) using tasks from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study (ABCD Study®). We added a 24-hour delay condition to assess long-term memory and assessed ages that overlap with those to be assessed in the 10-year ABCD study. Overall working memory, immediate, and long-term recognition memory performance peaked during adolescence. Age effects in recognition memory varied by items (i.e., old targets and distractors and new items) and delay. For immediate recognition, accuracy was higher for new items and targets than distractors, with the highest accuracy for new items emerging by the mid-teens. For long-term recognition, adolescents were more accurate in identifying new items than children and adults and adolescents showed more long-term forgetting of distractors relative to targets. In contrast, adults showed similar accuracy for targets and distractors, while children showed long-term forgetting of both. The results suggest that working memory processes may facilitate long-term storage of task-relevant items over irrelevant items and may benefit the detection of novel information during adolescence.

Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is a common and burdensome, often long-term side effect of cancer and its treatment. Many non-pharmacological treatments have been investigated as possible CRF therapies, including exercise, nutrition, health/psycho-education, and mind-body therapies. However, studies directly comparing the efficacy of these treatments in randomized controlled trials are lacking. To fill this gap, we conducted a parallel single blind randomized controlled pilot efficacy trial with women with CRF to directly compare the effects of Qigong (a form of mind-body intervention) (n = 11) to an intervention that combined strength and aerobic exercise, plant-based nutrition and health/psycho-education (n = 13) in a per protocol analysis. This design was chosen to determine the comparative efficacy of 2 non-pharmacologic interventions, with different physical demand intensities, in reducing the primary outcome measure of self-reported fatigue (FACIT “Additional Concerns” subscale). Both interventions showed a mean fatigue improvement of more than double the pre-established minimal clinically important difference of 3 (qigong: 7.068 ± 10.30, exercise/nutrition: 8.846 ± 12.001). Mixed effects ANOVA analysis of group × time interactions revealed a significant main effect of time, such that both groups significantly improved fatigue from pre- to post-treatment ( F(1,22) = 11.898, P = .002, generalized eta squared effect size = 0.116) There was no significant difference between fatigue improvement between groups (independent samples t-test: P = .70 ), suggesting a potential equivalence or non-inferiority of interventions, which we could not definitively establish due to our small sample size. This study provides evidence from a small sample of n = 24 women with CRF that qigong improves fatigue similarly to exercise-nutrition courses. Qigong additionally significantly improved secondary measures of mood, emotion regulation, and stress, while exercise/nutrition significantly improved secondary measures of sleep/fatigue. These findings provide preliminary evidence for divergent mechanisms of fatigue improvement across interventions, with qigong providing a gentler and lower-intensity alternative to exercise/nutrition.

Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is a common and burdensome, often long term side effect of cancer and its treatment. Many non-pharmacological treatments have been investigated as possible CRF therapies, including exercise, nutrition, health/psycho-education, and mind-body therapies. However, studies directly comparing the efficacy of these treatments are lacking. To fill this gap, we conducted a parallel single blind randomized control trial with women with CRF to directly compare the effects of Qigong (a form of mind-body intervention) (n=11) to an intervention that combined strength and aerobic exercise, plant-based nutrition and health/psycho-education (n=13). This design was chosen to determine the comparative efficacy of two non-pharmacologic interventions, with different physical demand intensity, in reducing the primary outcome measure of self-reported fatigue (FACIT Additional Concerns subscale). Both interventions showed a mean fatigue improvement of more than double the pre-established minimal clinically important difference of three (Qigong: 7.068 +/- 10.30, Exercise/Nutrition: 8.846 +/- 12.001). Mixed effects ANOVA analysis of group x time interactions revealed a significant main effect of time, such that both groups significantly improved fatigue from pre- to post treatment ( F(1,22)=11.898, p=.002, generalized eta squared effect size=.116) There was no significant difference between fatigue improvement between groups (independent samples t-test: p=.70 ), suggesting a potential equivalence or non-inferiority of interventions, which we could not definitively establish due to our small sample size. This study provides evidence from a small sample that Qigong improves fatigue similarly to standard exercise-nutrition. Qigong additionally significantly improved secondary measures of mood, emotion regulation, and stress, while exercise/nutrition significantly improved secondary measures of sleep/fatigue. These findings provide preliminary evidence for divergent mechanisms of fatigue improvement across interventions, with Qigong providing a gentler and lower-intensity alternative to exercise/nutrition. This clinical trial was registered with clinical trials.gov.