“…In the linear regression, the rsfMRI time series were third‐order detrended, and several sources of signal fluctuation unlikely to be of neuronal origin were regressed out as nuisance variables: (1) six parameters for rigid body head motion acquired from the motion correction (Johnstone et al., 2006), (2) the signal averaged over the lateral ventricles (Fox et al., 2005), (3) the signal averaged over a region centered in the deep cerebral white matter (Fox et al., 2005), and (4) the first temporal derivatives of the aforementioned parameters. After the linear regression, motion ‘scrubbing’ (Power, Barnes, Snyder, Schlaggar, & Petersen, 2012) was performed with a frame‐wise displacement (FD) of 0.5 mm and a standardized DVARS (http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/sci/statistics/staff/academic-research/nichols/scripts/fsl/DVARS.sh) of 1.8 to prevent potential motion artifacts (van Dijk, Sabuncu, & Buckner, 2012; Power et al., 2012; Satterthwaite et al., 2012). A standardized DVARS of 1.8 corresponds to the median plus 1.5 times interquartile range of the standardized DVARS data across all frames and runs.…”