2010
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2010.00056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The interaction between gaze and facial expression in the amygdala and extended amygdala is modulated by anxiety

Abstract: Behavioral evidence indicates that angry faces are seen as more threatening, and elicit greater anxiety, when directed at the observer, whereas the influence of gaze on the processing of fearful faces is less consistent. Recent research has also found inconsistent effects of expression and gaze direction on the amygdala response to facial signals of threat. However, such studies have failed to consider the important influence of anxiety on the response to signals of threat; an influence that is well establishe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
51
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
(128 reference statements)
9
51
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We also were not able to confirm former results showing increased amygdala activation under direct gaze compared with averted gaze in the whole group (Kawashima et al, 1999). However, recent evidence suggests that the amygdala response to gaze direction is dependent on different factors like the viewer's anxiety level and besides, these effects strongly differ with respect to different subnuclei of the amygdala (Ewbank et al, 2010;Hoffman et al, 2007;Straube et al, 2010). Therefore, our result of increased amygdala activation in the A + group under OT adds to evidence for an additional OT level and genotype-dependent reactivity of the amygdala to direct vs averted gaze.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…We also were not able to confirm former results showing increased amygdala activation under direct gaze compared with averted gaze in the whole group (Kawashima et al, 1999). However, recent evidence suggests that the amygdala response to gaze direction is dependent on different factors like the viewer's anxiety level and besides, these effects strongly differ with respect to different subnuclei of the amygdala (Ewbank et al, 2010;Hoffman et al, 2007;Straube et al, 2010). Therefore, our result of increased amygdala activation in the A + group under OT adds to evidence for an additional OT level and genotype-dependent reactivity of the amygdala to direct vs averted gaze.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…This result is also consistent with earlier work that reported that the ventral amygdala is heavily involved in coding signals of ambiguity and responds more to an ambiguous or probable threat [22,54]. Many studies found that individual levels of anxiety only influence amygdala activities to ambiguous or subthreshold threat information, but not to apparent or suprathreshold threat information[18,19,20,21,22]. These results parallel our findings that TA influences ventral amygdala activity in response to ambiguous, neutral stimuli.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Recognition of facial expressions and assessing the level of potential threat based on facial recognition appear to constitute important aspects of an approachability judgment. Although the relationship between amygdala response to fearful faces and anxiety level has been investigated in healthy participants [18,19,20,21,22], no study has focused on the potential relationship between the participant's neural response during approachability judgments and his or her threat sensitivity. Interestingly, in previous studies, a significant relationship between neural response to fearful faces and anxiety scores emerged during a psychological task that did not require attention to or conscious awareness of the faces [18,19,20,21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, social interactions involve the comprehension of social cues, such as expressed behavior and speech, in conjunction with knowledge about a person and situation. Gaze [103,104], body cues [105], and voices [106] are all relevant social signals. These different signals influence each other, and emotional faces showing direct gaze are processed less efficiently [104].…”
Section: Social "Building Blocks"mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These different signals influence each other, and emotional faces showing direct gaze are processed less efficiently [104]. The way in which this integration occurs can be affected by individual factors, such as anxiety [103]. Social competence includes face recognition as well as emotion recognition [102], and the changeable aspects of a face (such as movements) and its invariant aspects (e.g.…”
Section: Social "Building Blocks"mentioning
confidence: 99%