“…In recent years moral dumbfounding has been challenged by a number of authors (e.g., Gray et al, 2014;Jacobson, 2012;Sneddon, 2007;Wielenberg, 2014), arguing, in line with rationalist theories of moral judgement (Kohlberg, 1971;Narvaez, 2005;Topolski, Weaver, Martin, & McCoy, 2013), that moral judgements are grounded in reasons. Recent work by Royzman, Kim, and Leeman (2015), involving a series of studies focusing on the Incest dilemma, identified two reasons that may be guiding participants' judgements.…”